[ 01 — Compare · Luni vs Fathom ]
Luni vs Fathom.
↳ Fathom
Fathom built a strong free tier (Y Combinator-backed, US-based) with quick recap delivery.
↳ Luni
Luni matches Fathom's polish + adds three-platform parity and reply-to-edit recap workflows.
[ 02 — Side by side ]
The capability matrix.
↳ Capability
Luni
Fathom
Zoom
Yes
Yes
Google Meet
Yes
Yes
Microsoft Teams
Yes (parity)
Yes (newer)
Free tier
10 meetings / month
Unlimited recordings
Pro starting price
£10 / user / month
$15 / user / month
Recap quality
Editorial, structured
Templated, fast
Reply-to-edit recap
Yes
No
Continuous recordings (recurring meetings stitched)
Yes (Enterprise)
No
↳ Fathom pricing as of public marketing site · Luni pricing in GBP, ex VAT
[ 03a — When Fathom is right ]
Fathom is the better fit when…
- · You want unlimited recordings free + don't need workspace features
- · You already use Fathom and the workflow muscle memory matters more than feature deltas
[ 03b — Why teams pick Luni ]
The case for Luni.
- · Microsoft Teams parity at launch (Fathom rolled it out late and per-platform UX still varies)
- · Reply to a recap email with edit instructions and Luni regenerates it — workflow Fathom doesn't have
- · Continuous recordings on Enterprise — recurring meetings stitched into one searchable thread
[ 05 — Get in ]Try Luni when access opens.