[ 01 — Compare · Luni vs Otter.ai ]
Luni vs Otter.ai.
↳ Otter.ai
Otter.ai is the consumer-grade incumbent — broad reach, freemium, English-first.
↳ Luni
Luni is editorial, not gimmicky. Same job, calmer interface, all three platforms with parity.
[ 02 — Side by side ]
The capability matrix.
↳ Capability
Luni
Otter.ai
Zoom
Yes
Yes
Google Meet
Yes
Yes
Microsoft Teams
Yes
Yes (paid only)
Live captions
Coming
Yes
Recap + action items
Yes (every plan)
Pro+ only
Reply-to-edit recap
Yes
No
Continuous recordings (recurring meetings stitched)
Weekly 1:1s, biweekly QBRs, monthly board — every instance threads into one searchable conversation with cross-meeting deltas.
Yes (Enterprise)
No
Free tier
Otter's cap is meeting-length-bound; Luni's is a count.
10 meetings / month, 60 min cap
300 min / month, 30 min cap
Pro starting price
£10 / user / month (annual)
$8.33 / user / month (annual)
Team workspace
Team plan, £20/user/mo
Business plan, $20/user/mo
↳ Otter.ai pricing as of public marketing site · Luni pricing in GBP, ex VAT
[ 03a — When Otter.ai is right ]
Otter.ai is the better fit when…
- · You want a free transcript-only product with no need for summaries or action items
- · You record solo lectures or interviews more than meetings
- · You're already deep in the Otter ecosystem with shared folders and historical recordings
[ 03b — Why teams pick Luni ]
The case for Luni.
- · Same recording quality without the in-meeting bot pop-ups + chat-window interruptions
- · Recap reads like a faithful summary, not a marketing-flavoured highlight reel
- · Three-platform parity — Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams treated identically (Otter is Zoom-heavy)
- · Word for word recap delivered the moment the meeting ends, not after a delay
[ 05 — Get in ]Try Luni when access opens.